Lexsynergy Ltd.

lex_logo

Regain Your Domain

ryd_logo

Darkest .Africa

DomainNews.co.za received an email from DotConnectAfrica one of the applicants for the .Africa new gTLD, who were attempting to set the record straight concerning the .Africa TLD.

We have insert the contents of the email below. It makes for interesting reading.

The attention of the Yes2DotAfrica Campaign has been drawn to various media reports published on Internet web sites (for example, www.mybroadband.co.za  and 

www.businessdailyafrica.com regarding the putative selection of UniForum S.A. as the registry operator of the DotAfrica gTLD by the African Union Commission (AUC).  Some other Internet media reports also mention that UniForum has received an ‘endorsement from the AU’ for the administration of the DotAfrica gTLD.  

Most of these reports are quite misleading since a firm cannot be selected to administer a domain that has not yet been delegated, even as we understand the very impossibility of the African Union mainstreaming itself strategically within a particular proposal in a policy-oversight role whilst also playing the tactical role of a ‘self-endorsing’ entity in order to singularly control the fate of DotAfrica. It is therefore important to set the records straight in the global public interest

Against the backdrop that DCA already received the AU endorsement for DotAfrica since 2009, and despite several dishonest attempts to deny or invalidate and withdraw the endorsement through various acts of sabotage including using a forged letter of unknown provenance, DCA has remained steadfast and undaunted;  and has continued with its independent promotional campaign in pursuit of its objective of applying for DotAfrica through the ICANN new gTLD programme, and would like to issue this statement in reaction to these misleading news reports that have been published on Internet web sites.  

Therefore, DCA would like to issue this statement in reaction to these misleading and deceptive news reports that have been published (or ‘planted’) on Internet web sites with the sole objective of manipulating public opinion and giving false momentum to UniForum’s DotAfrica application prospects. 

  • We hereby denounce the entire exercise as illegitimate and all those who are party to it, including the members of the AU Task Force on DotAfrica, have participated in an act of illegality. In the not too distant future, they will all be called to account fully for their actions.  
  • In addition to this public denunciation of a very illegitimate exercise that only gives credence to the fact that UniForum is now the principal beneficiary of wholesale illegality, we hereby warn any prospective collaborators not to associate themselves with this tainted process; and also use this opportunity to unequivocally warn SEDARI not to cooperate with them and allow  itself to be used to render any strategic, technical, or registry management services advise in connection with the DotAfrica gTLD; but to stay away from this initiative, and not soil its international image in a corrupt process that we believe is already associated with the selection of UniForum. By openly announcing its cooperation with UniForum in this matter, we believe that SEDARI will be joining itself to illegality by cooperating with UniForum, and the expected benefits of such cooperation will pale in comparison to the reputational risk that it will suffer.
  • The Yes2DotAfrica Campaign had already identified many problems with the AU RFP in December 2011, and DCA has decided at a very early stage not to participate in the AU RFP process to select an operator for the DotAfrica registry. For this reason, Yes2DotAfrica will not accept any questionable endorsement or selection of UniForum that is the putative outcome of a flawed and illegitimate exercise.

 If it is generally accepted that the DotAfrica gTLD does not belong to the African Union (AU) but to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), how could the AU legitimately select a registry operator for a gTLD that it does not own?   

  •  If the as yet un-delegated gTLD namespace rightfully belonged to the African Union, then ICANN would have given it to them following their official request in Dakar Senegal to have the DotAfrica name, and similar strings in any language included in the Top-Level Reserved Names List for their sole benefit.   In our view, the ICANN Board’s equable decision not to reserve this name for the AU was a total repudiation of the e-sovereignty concept. If ICANN by its very decision during the last quarter of 2011 not to reserve the DotAfrica name for the AU already determined, ipso facto, that the un-delegated DotAfrica gTLD does not belong to the African Union, why should we give any credence to the questionable selection of UniForum as the registry operator of DotAfrica in a process overseen by the AU DotAfrica Task Force acting under the aegis of the African Union?  
  • We strongly believe that the AU is simply one stakeholder in a multi-stakeholder process,  and cannot single-handedly outsource, or contract with any organization or participate in the process of selecting a registry operator for a DotAfrica gTLD that it does not own, nor is within its right to delegate. The AU cannot mainstream itself within a particular proposal and endorse the same proposal when it does not possess any sovereignty or ownership over DotAfrica gTLD as an Internet resource that belongs legally to ICANN.
  • We wish to inform the global public that the entire process was fraught with  irregularities and   injustice, favoritism and conflict of interest,  when critically examined from every angle, completely  falls short of the proper ethical standards of probity and accountability.   First, the executives of UniForum SA had attempted to use Domain Names Services (Pty) Ltd.  (DNS) (a company wholly owned by them) to perpetrate a questionable tie-up with Convergence Investment Partners (CIP) and consummate the formation of the African Registry Consortium (ARC), and when this was exposed by the Yes2DotAfrica Campaign as a potential BEE scam that reeked of rent-seeking and business opportunism, the ARC arrangement failed.
  • The question that we should all ask is: how did the executives of UniForum who had attempted the formation of ARC with the BEE Group, and when that effort failed due to lack of community support and AU endorsement, the same executives are now claiming in the media that they have been selected and endorsed by the AU to run the DotAfrica registry?  It is quite obvious that these same management – and  directors of DNS (Pty.) Ltd. – who failed in their potential BEE scam over ARC have now decided to run the gauntlet themselves and try to launder their image afresh with the African Union Commission.   These people should be thoroughly investigated, and not lionized for having been illegitimately selected to operate a DotAfrica registry that is not within the powers of the African Union to delegate.
  • We believe that it is important to sensitize all those who believe in justice, truth, honesty and accountability all over the world to hold the AU up to the strictest ethical standards in this matter, and let them explain how this matter was handled that resulted in the selection of a discredited special interest group that comprises of potential BEE scammers and their cohorts  in the AU DotAfrica Task Force, a Cabal that, following the failure of the ARC proposal (‘Plan A’), is now using UniForum, a non-profit, as a convenient existing vehicle (‘Plan B’) to foster their illegitimate objectives  with a view to gaining respectability before the global public.
  • We urge the AU Commission, as a respected inter-governmental organization, to act like ICANN whose gTLD programme activities in the global public interest compels it to be transparent and accountable in its transactions including recording and publishing every necessary information such as Board discussions and minutes for the consumption of the global public.
  • Therefore, we hereby challenge the African Union to act immediately in the greater interest of global public transparency and accountability, to release forthwith, the details of the EOI process and the RFP;
  1. indicate which firms and organizations participated in it,
  2. what they had each proposed;
  3. how they were evaluated,
  4. what merit-based system was employed in the evaluation of the respective proposals,
  5. the relative scores obtained by each evaluated participant,
  6. the final rankings and how the decision was arrived at to select UniForum South Africa as ‘an African-based registry’;
  7. the final evaluation committee minutes that were taken during the meeting to decide on the selection,
  8. the names of those who assented to those minutes;
  9. the decision of the AU Tenders Board to approve the selection of UniForum S.A.
  10. and the official signatories to that decision
  11. and finally make a full disclosure of all these through a public media announcement.
  • We also call upon the ICANN Governmental Advisory Council (GAC) and all African governments including those represented at ICANN to hold the African Union Commission satisfy all these aspects of probity and insist that it conforms to these ideals of transparency and accountability over DotAfrica and make full disclosure as detailed under (10) above.

 

  • We reaffirm our faith in the ICANN-led process as the only transparent structure that we shall follow over DotAfrica, and insist that the eventual fate of DotAfrica can only be determined by ICANN, the only organization empowered to create DotAfrica and introduce it into the root zone of the Internet.
  • Until the application season is over, and all gTLD applications are subsequently evaluated and legitimate winners announced by ICANN, we believe that it is very premature for UniForum to presumptuously undertake any unnecessary self-promotion in the media that it has been selected to operate the DotAfrica registry by an inter-governmental organization that does not have the pertinent rights to the resource.
  • No one is fooled. Pride goeth before a fail.  If UniForum had indeed been selected by the African Union, then a formal announcement should have been made by AU. In the absence of any such official confirmation, we think UniForum has simply been seeking cheap publicity whilst engaging in media manipulation.  
  •  We reiterate that the AU’s selection of a registry operator for a gTLD resource that it does not own is legally problematic, and does not in any way constitute a legitimate endorsement, and, as we shall continue to demonstrate, these types of activities by UniForum and their cohorts within the AU DotAfrica Task Force only highlight the difficult road ahead for DotAfrica.
  • We hereby call on all the supporters of DCA in Africa and other continents and regions to remain steadfast and unperturbed, since we remain totally committed to this struggle for the achievement of an open and independent DotAfrica gTLD and keep it free from the clutches and sinister influence of the Cabal which intends to hijack it by any means necessary.

    Having therefore issued this open warning to UniForum and the AU to beware of wrongdoing over DotAfrica, if the eventual delegation of DotAfrica is continuously delayed, or Africans are denied the opportunity of realizing their vision of having the first ever geographic TLD for the benefit of the people of the continent, history will record the role played by these two organizations in this matter for the harsh judgment of posterity. We also believe that the executives of UniForum S.A. will be severally and collectively called to account and will not be spared the same harsh judgment for whatever role they have played in this saga.   

The harshest judgment will be reserved for the members of AU DotAfrica Task Force who inveigled the AU to deviate from the right path over DotAfrica. First, they preached the idea of uniting all Africans under a community-driven agenda, but have now turned around instead to promote a South African agenda that is now represented by UniForum and its self-serving executives.

New CO.ZA Platform

Lexsynergy is one of the first registrars to be accredited with Uniforum SA (co.za Registry) and to implement their new registry-registrar platform using Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP).

The new platform is intended to improve the efficiency of registering and managing co.za domain names.

What does the new platform mean for co.za registrants?

• The Whois information will change as it will no longer display technical, administrative and billing contact information. See the Whois screenshot of Lexsynergy.co.za below.
• It will take 5 days to update registrant information but the registrant will not be required to accept an update ticket as is the case with the legacy system (old email ticketing system).
• Transfers from one accredited registrar to another will be processed immediately once accepted by the registrant. If the transfer is not accepted it will complete after 5 days of submitting the transfer request. If the registrant declines, the transfer will not complete.
• Nameserver updates will be processed in near real-time so the legacy system of waiting 24hours for nameservers to update will be a thing of the past.

The new EPP registry-registrar platform is a step in the right direction, bringing co.za domain names to the global market.

Email domains@lexsynergy.com if you have any question regrading co.za domain names or any other TLD worldwide.

co.za Accredited Registrar

co.za Accredited Registrar

What happening to .GH?

The National Information Technology Agency (NITA), the Information Technology Implementing Agency of the Ministry of Communications has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Ghana Dot Com, a successor company of Network Computer Systems Limited.

Ghana Dot Com (GDC), the current manager of the .gh domain namespace, is to begin the process of transfer of the management of the namespace to Government.

This is in line with the Electronic Transaction Act 2008 (ACT 772) which empowers the Minister of Communications to hold the name space and manage it in trust for the people of Ghana.

NITA has been empowered to ensure the implementation and enforcement of the provisions of the Electronic Transactions Act (ETA), and as part of its mandate will be managing the .gh namespace on behalf of the Minister of Communications, Ghana.

The signing of the MOU puts NITA in a position to begin plans to implement the re-development programme of the .gh registry. NITA’s plan is to implement a world class domain registry solution that will make domain registration available online and accessible to all citizens and businesses in Ghana.

Since June 2011, NITA has been going through a process to procure world-class registry software and will soon conclude the process. As part of the preparation to manage the domain space, NITA will begin a local Internet community industry stakeholder forum prescribed by ETA to discuss the general management and policy of the domain namespace in February 2012.

NITA has also beefed up its team with domain name business expertise to help it manage the domain namespace efficiently.

The current manager of the namespace, GDC, has agreed by the MOU to support NITA by ensuring a smooth transfer of zone data and will not contest re-delegation of the domain space by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) which is the global body that manages the domain name systems, including country code top level domains (ccTLD).

Ghana Dot Com has managed the .gh domain namespace since 1995 and has confirmed in the MOU its willingness to support NITA technically and administratively in the running of the registry after the re-delegation.

NITA was established by Act 771 and passed by the Parliament of Ghana in December, 2008 and is the Government Agency responsible for the implementation of e-Government.

NITA is the ICT implementation arm of the Ministry of Communications and is tasked with the objectives of regulating the provision of information communications technology, ensuring the provision of quality information communications technology, promoting standards of efficiency in ICT and ensuring high quality of ICT services.

Essentially, NITA’s responsibilities include executing the third component of the e-Ghana project, ensuring the integration of ICT into government business processes, to achieve greater efficiency and effective service delivery to citizens, ensuring significant cost reduction in the provision and maintenance of ICT infrastructure and services by leveraging economies of scale (Shared ICT Services).

It would also ensure accessibility and convenience of Government services by leveraging ICTs, ensuring the implementation and enforcement of the provisions of the Electronic Transactions Act 2008 and implementing and adoption of Digital Signature technology by Government

Source: http://www.businessghana.com/portal/news/index.php?op=getNews&news_cat_id=&id=159711

Yahoo! re-launches website in South Africa

Yahoo - South Africa

Yahoo - South Africa

Yahoo! has re-launched their South African portal, with a new Yahoo! homepage, new Yahoo! Mail and a new Yahoo! News section. South Africa currently has 2.6-million Yahoo! users, and with the new mail system, users will be able to have an email address with a .co.za domain name.

“This is a great opportunity for Yahoo! to bring its existing and new users in South Africa the best of Yahoo!’s services and content alongside great local content. This is a first step – there’s more to come – and we are enthusiastic about the bright future we see for everything that’s digital in South Africa. Internet users are coming rapidly online and Yahoo!’s unique combination of Science, Art and Scale positions us well to work with advertisers and agencies in growing the online advertising here,” said Matt West, Director Content Partners and Expansion Markets for Yahoo! at the launch in Johannesburg.

The Yahoo! News section aims to deliver daily news, sports, finance, entertainment, science and tech news from various sources, including TEAMtalk Media, the Mail & Guardian Online, The Daily Maverick and Memeburn.

“South Africans have had a close relationship with the Yahoo! brand from the earliest times of the internet. The launch of this new Yahoo! homepage will further deepen this relationship with the best South African and international news welcoming each South African visitor every morning. South Africa’s digital media industry has never been more healthy and, as proud South Africans, Apurimac Media look forward to working with Yahoo! in achieving future success by helping local businesses reach and engage with this large, diverse and growing audience,” added Will Green, Managing Director for Apurimac Media, Yahoo!’s business development partners.

Scramble for ‘dot africa’ internet domain name

(CNN) — A proposed new “.africa” internet domain name will provide a stronger brand identity than current little known country domains, while preventing registration revenues flowing abroad, say backers.

DotConnectAfrica, a non-profit organization registered in Mauritius, is one of the groups vying to establish and operate the dot africa name space for businesses and individuals across the continent.

The opportunity has arisen since the Internet Corporation for Names and Numbers (ICANN), the body which manages internet domain names, voted earlier this year to allow new varieties of top-level domains — the suffix of an internet address.

ICANN will be accepting applications for new generic top-level domains, or gTLDs, between January and April next year, with successful applications expected to be operational by 2013.

Two other groups — the African Top-Level Domains Association and the African Registry Consortium — have also expressed an interest in applying to operate “.africa”, while the African Union has said it plans to endorse a group to apply for the rights to operate the domain on its behalf.

The African Union Commission also plans to apply to ICANN to operate the “.africa” domain, along with the French and Arabic alternatives “.afrique” and “.afriqia”. It is currently running an open tender process for technical organizations to operate the domains on its behalf, which will be included in the AUC’s application to ICANN.

DotConnectAfrica executive director Sophia Bekele said that the suffixes for individual African countries — country code top-level domains, or ccTLDs — had generally proven unpopular during the decade or so of their existence.

Research by her company suggested 80% of African domain name registrants had opted for “.com” or “.org” suffixes instead, which were price competitive, reliable to register and had wide recognition.

By contrast, the ccTLDs were little known, as they were “usually owned by governments, and governments are typically not very good at marketing,” she said.

Moctar Yedaly, head of information society for the African Union Commission, said the commission’s vision for the .africa domain went beyond the commercial.

“It may well be a very good business in terms of money generating. If it may generate some revenue we can use for the development of ICT in Africa, then that is all very good, but that’s not my primary goal,” he said. “My primary goal is to ensure the identity of Africa, the image, the culture are well-maintained.”

The .africa domain represented all Africans in the same way as the African Union flag, and its dignity needed to be protected. “I wouldn’t like to see ‘.africa’ used for something pornographic,” he said.

It should operate in the “interests of the community”, rather than the interests of individuals in the private sector. “This is for Africa, and Africa is 54 states.”

Bekele said that in campaigning to build support for DotConnectAfrica’s proposal, the group had encountered a strong response from youth and from business for the notion of a pan-African online identity. More than 3,600 prospective registrants had expressed interest by “pre-registering” with DotConnectAfrica.

She said young developers involved in creating local content felt a stronger affinity with a potential “.africa” suffix than to “.com” domains, while it also appealed to corporates, who would be able to unify their presence across the continent under a single online brand.

John Kariuki is the founder and CEO of AAR Credit Services, a Kenyan-based micro-finance company. The company also operates in Uganda and Tanzania, where it is looking to expand its operations, but currently uses a Kenyan “co.ke” suffix.

“For companies looking to expand throughout Africa, it’s a good way of creating a brand identity,” he said of the potential domain. “What really appeals to us is expressing that African identity. Sometimes you don’t really know where these companies are from.”

Bekele said that if her group was successful in its application to establish and operate the domain, it would look offer domains at prices competitive to “.com” registrations — $5 for students, or between $9 to $19 for small- to medium-enterprises.

A major benefit of the “.africa” domain would be that proceeds from African domain registrations would remain on the continent, rather than flowing offshore. DotConnectAfrica says it plans to reinvest surpluses into developing the African internet sector.

She said there was concern from governments that a “.africa” domain could jeopardize the existing ccTLDs.

“But I can assure you, if there is no ‘.africa’, I don’t think there will be any more uptake of the ccTLDs,” she said.

However, not everyone is as optimistic about the potential impact of the new generic top-level domains. Ray Valdes, vice-president of web services for tech consultancy Gartner, said that because the new wave of gTLDs went “against the grain of current consumer trends”, his company expected most of them to fall short of their goals.

To be successful, the new gTLDs would require a change in consumer behavior, plus a change in how search engines index the internet.

Users would have to type unfamiliar text strings into the address bar of the their browser, at a time when consumers were increasingly relying on search engines and social media to navigate the internet.

He said that given the $185,000 price tag to apply for the new gTLDs, most organizations would be better served by investing in creating faster, more usable sites that are more easily indexed by search engines, and broadening the social media presence of their organization.

However, he did expect a handful of regional-based gTLDs like “.africa” to be successful, depending on how well they were operated and how consumers responded.

ICANN will not make a decision on control of the domain until after the application closes in April next year.

Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2011/12/07/tech/africa-domain-name/ by By Tim Hume, for CNN